Is Giving iPads to Students a Waste of Money?

The LA Unified School District (LA USD) recently initiated a program to provide students with iPads, which the justified by claiming that the iPads would cost less than providing every student with textbooks and other instructional materials.  The LA USD provided 30,000 students with iPads that were already populated with the textbooks, instructional materials, and educational programs the district had selected.  Each iPad was programmed to block certain web sites, like Facebook.

The problem – students aren’t stupid and figured out how to overcome the security programming so that they could access any web sites they wanted within a few hours.  The school division will now be confiscating the iPads and providing students with hard copy textbooks and instructional materials.

Many schools in our county have begun providing iPads or other tablets to students, claiming that the devices cost less than textbooks and other instructional materials.  I haven’t seen the math to back up that claim and find it dubious at best.  Parents have been assured that the devices are enabled with security that will prevent students from accessing unauthorized web sites, but, as the case in LA USD indicates, students are pretty darn smart when it comes to gaining access to the information they want.

Maybe our schools need to re-consider their plans to provide iPads or similar devised to students.  The claims of reduced cost have not been substantiated and the devices aren’t without risk as students will be able to access information we may not want them accessing.  Most important, however, is whether the devices actually improve student learning. There is no evidence that iPads or other devices actually improve student learning and some evidence that they actually undermine it.

We need to think before we jump.


3 Responses to “Is Giving iPads to Students a Waste of Money?”

  1. S.T. Says:

    This county misses the mark on everything they do. Just provide good old fashion education with text books and traditional math and stop trying so hard with pools and laptops. Ugh!

  2. Michele Boyd Says:

    I concur! Let’s not be lemmings & waste much needed money on the latest shiny object without any supporting evidence. The iPads will become obsolete in the blink of an eye & the need next becomes to purchase the newest version of the shiny object. Has anyone heard of The Waldorf Schools that are very popular in Silicon Valley with the technology set? It’s where the big execs from Google, Apple, etc, send their kids to be educated. No technology…just chalk, blackboards, paper, pencils, old fashioned teaching, creative thinking, & hands on learning. There was a great article in the New York Times about it a few years ago.

  3. John S Gray CPA Says:

    I think the SB needs to get back to basics. It is rudderless, meaning no leadership. Several members have been on it too long and haven’t any new ideas. Too many rubberstamp whatever the Admin says to do. It is appalling. If any member votes for a program that takes money “out of the class room”, and by that I mean votes for pools or iPads, then that member needs to be challenged and defeated in 2015. Where the hell is this County headed to? Gawd knows there’s no leadership from with the SB or the BoCS.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: